This video looks at some of the major problems that plague the current practice of science. How do skewed incentives lead to the publishing of sloppy science? Publication bias, p-hacking, the replication crisis, and predatory / fake journals are discussed and what this means for the reliability of scientific findings as a whole. The video then looks at solutions to these problems. Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ScienceLiteracyChannel/ Twitter page: https://twitter.com/SciLiteracyChan SOURCES: 1:05 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12038911 https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/123/9/1964/282957/Reproducibility-of-peer-review-in-clinical http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/ 1:10 : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9163412 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761670/#!po=3.12500 1:20 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2439458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858206/ 1:32 : https://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process 2:06 : http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00325-8/fulltext 2:15 : http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2503172 2:47 : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21360256 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787082 3:04 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12928469 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17028106 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20679560 3:15 : Goldacre. “Bad Pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients” 3:21 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3733739/ http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470870141.html 3:34 : http://www.alltrials.net/ 3:50 : http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132382 4:05 : https://jnrbm.biomedcentral.com/ http://www.jnr-eeb.org/index.php/jnr http://www.jasnh.com/ 4:13 : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25988604 4:20 : http://www.bmj.com/content/320/7249/1574?goto=reply https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-016-1880-1 4:48 : http://www.nature.com/news/scientific-method-statistical-errors-1.14700 5:33 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122713 5:59 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588329 6:27 : http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 6:57 : http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(05)00023-5/fulltext 7:28 : http://www.fdareview.org/03_drug_development.php 7:35 : http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049 http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60329-9/abstract http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)62329-6/fulltext 7:50 : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18782430 http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7572/782 8:09 : http://www.milbank.org/uploads/documents/The_Mass_Production_of_Redundant_Misleading_and_Conflicted_Systematic_Reviews_and_Meta-Analyses.pdf 8:31 : http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/clinical-fakes-09272016141438.html 9:10 : http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-39598-001 https://www.nature.com/news/metascience-could-rescue-the-replication-crisis-1.16275 9:22 : http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970 9:38 : http://www.ascb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/final-survey-results-without-Q11.pdf 9:58 : http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/201218#COMMENT 10:13 : http://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716 10:32 : http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691612460688 10:50 : https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/replication-and-contradiction-of-highly-cited-research-papers-in-psychiatry-10year-followup/F97369E4B6D2E13EEB04E0DD2F777734 11:04 : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.201606591/full 11:46 : http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(13)00405-9/fulltext 12:06 : https://osf.io/ezcuj/ https://elifesciences.org/collections/9b1e83d1/reproducibility-project-cancer-biology http://www.socialsciencesreplicationproject.com/ 12:40 : http://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/17028 12:47 : http://retractionwatch.com/ 12:56 : http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/full/478026a.html 13:07 : http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563 13:28 : http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 13:46 : http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm 13:54 : https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4552050 13:56 : https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.5260.pdf 14:03 : http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0141076814548526 14:25 : http://www.chronicle.com/article/Publisher-Threatens-to-Sue/139243/?cid=at http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/05/litigation/what-is-alleged-defamation-worth-1-billion-on-a-librarians-salary/#_ http://www.biochemia-medica.com/2017/27/273 See video or message me on FB for remainder of sources - video description was too long