==JOIN THE DISCORD!== https://discord.gg/xbVEkhPJ72 AMD released Anti-lag+ because they need lower latency on their graphics cards in-general, but also to mend the issues caused by FSR 3- frame generation. This is competing directly with Nvidia's Reflex technology which has existed for a while and held them at the king of the market in terms of GPU and overall system latency. So this video is sort-of a Anti-lag+ vs Reflex, but there is a lot more to it. There are some specific issues with Anti-lag+, especially since it is exclusive to Radeon rx 7000 series GPUs. I was able to test it because I've got an rx 7800 xt, although most people aren't in this position. What does this mean when FSR 3 Frame Generation is backwards-compatible with older GPUs, but Anti-lag+ is not? Why Anti-lag+ is great, but it doesn't matter. Monitoring software I used for some latency testing: https://www.capframex.com/ Nvidia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cXg7GQogAE AMD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKmaNgPTbig https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/technologies/reflex/ https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/technologies/reflex/supported-products/ https://www.igorslab.de/en/radeon-anti-lag-vs-nvidia-reflex-im-test-latenzvergleich/13/ https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/radeon-software-anti-lag https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming/first-look-at-amd-fidelityfx-super-resolution-3/ba-p/626581 0:00- The latency competition 1:23- Latency testing is tricky 3:37- Anti-lag+ vs Reflex 6:14- Can you feel it? 9:00- CPU issues 11:50- Anti-lag+ won't help