SHARE, LIKE & SUBSCRIBE.
Support the channel: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=56069659
Sign up to the new Website: https://www.splitthefacts.com/
There's nothing on there yet, but sign up now for the future; let's keep the content dependent only on us, and you, and not reliant on potentially fickle platform providers.
Harry and Meghan take the Interviewer, Dr Jackson, to court over his conduct during the three interviews they generously gave him: Dr Jackson delivers his defence. (Part 3 of 3)
#meghanmarkle #oprahwinfrey #splitthewestatwarwithitself #parody #harryandmeghan #princeharry #royalinterview
Transcript:
ACS: We shall now hear the defence: Dr Jackson.
CJ: Thank you, Judge. I think I’ve been mis-characterised by my accusers.
H: Objection.
ACS: Overruled. He hasn’t said anything yet.
CJ: My deep sense of intrigue with this pseudo-royal couple stems from the fact that Meghan Markle, and Harry Megahn Markle Windsor, to some degree, have their fingers on a fault line, a rupture point; they have become immensely important because they embody the clashing of modernity and tradition.
(Meghan looks up)
(Harry texting)
CJ: Meghan and Harry pursue their course with an astounding vigour: nothing is ever too much, or too low, or too cringeworthy; they stick their necks on the line for their cause, and I respect that.
(Harry looks up from phone) Did he just say he respected me?
M: Us. Probably more me. He put my name first.
CJ: If they want to ensnare the world in their net of moral codes and enforced regulation, they need to appeal to a wider audience. Their emotion-filled brains sometimes miss the harder truths, too busy concentrating on love.
(Meghan agrees subtly)
(Harry looks enraptured)
CJ: To appeal to a wider audience, you have to prove the foundations of your thoughts and vocalised mantras. You have to be subjected to tough questioning to prove your beliefs make sense. I wanted to help in that way.
(Meghan smiles from the side of her mouth)
CJ: We can assume they must make sense, considering how passionately they project their beliefs, and with such frequency, but no one had yet helped them explain the popcorn principles and candified codes of conduct they preach. So I thought I’d help out.
(Meghan look smiley)
(Harry enraptured even deeper)
CJ: I said, during our third interview, the one that ended so abruptly, that I was trying to coat your argument in molten steel by subjecting it to its most valid criticisms; making it stronger and helping defend your position.
(Meghan nodding along)
(Harry wipes a tear)
CJ: That’s what I was doing: I was trying to help. You didn’t invite me to, nor did you ask for it, but you know all about that; you make a living out of it. Like I’ve already said, your heads are filled with honeycomb phosphorus foamy feelings - how could you be expected to be logical?
(meghan nodding)
(harry nodding, weeping gently)
CJ: I plead not guilty; and I don’t blame my accusers, I understand why they were hurt, but I only intended to help. I can say one this to both of you, and I swear it to be as true to anything uttered on this planet.
(meghan anticipates)
(Harry anticipates)
CJ: If I wasn’t as communist as you, I wouldn’t get any work.
H: Oh I’ve heard enough, we drop our case. Dismiss it.
M: Even though he shouldn’t have spoken before me, I agree. Dr Jackson’s words have moved me, especially the bit about us both giving advice that nobody asked for. That’s something that is very important to me.
(Dr Jackson nods)
ACS: The charges are dropped, and I must say I’m glad, I hope to see you in some more interviews soon. I’ve been watching them during this trial; jolly good.
(Dr Jackson bows in appreciation)
ACS: Oh, out of interest, what verdict did the jury leaning?
Barman: We were leaning towards not guilty, mainly because GSH, Grievous Spiritual Harm is not a real crime.
98 Comments